In 1976 when we came to Williamsport and initially became “dog people”,
there was a small group of us who were primarily interested in obedience. The
majority of folks, however, were breed oriented and the local AKC club was dominated by
the breed people. The obedience folks began to organize and formed an obedience
dog training club and I was somewhat involved at the time. Now in 2008, I
wondered what, if anything happened to that obedience group. When in doubt,
Google. So I did. Up popped The Williamsport Dog Training Club. Their website indicated that classes
were starting in May. One of those classes was for beginners.
This time I asked permission to observe and via email I did get an invitation! The first class was for people only, no dogs. I went and the lady running the class gave a good over-view and informed us that the class was totally positive, non-aversive, using clickers. Sounded good to me. She did, however, make a comment that gave me pause. She said that if you trained a dog with a collar and leash, then you would end up with a dog that would be under control, only when he was wearing a collar and leash. If that were true, then no one would ever have qualified for those titles where the dogs are off leash! She said that since leash laws required dogs be attached to their handlers, collars and leashes would be required for classes, but the collars had to be flat collars. She stated that the most important purpose of a dog’s collar was to hold the license, rabies and identification tags. As far as the leash was concerned, the handlers could loop it around their waists so that it did not drag on the ground.
This time I asked permission to observe and via email I did get an invitation! The first class was for people only, no dogs. I went and the lady running the class gave a good over-view and informed us that the class was totally positive, non-aversive, using clickers. Sounded good to me. She did, however, make a comment that gave me pause. She said that if you trained a dog with a collar and leash, then you would end up with a dog that would be under control, only when he was wearing a collar and leash. If that were true, then no one would ever have qualified for those titles where the dogs are off leash! She said that since leash laws required dogs be attached to their handlers, collars and leashes would be required for classes, but the collars had to be flat collars. She stated that the most important purpose of a dog’s collar was to hold the license, rabies and identification tags. As far as the leash was concerned, the handlers could loop it around their waists so that it did not drag on the ground.
Our speaker stated she tended to be long winded and I can
confirm that she did not disappoint! It put me in memory of my Bubby (that’s
what we called my Grandmother). We would have dinner at Bubby’s and she would
pile your plate high with delicious
food that only Bubby could cook. If you cleaned your plate, which, of course,
was expected, Bubby was "Johny on the spot" to ladle out more of the “good stuff”.
By the time the meal was over you could hardly waddle away from the table. The
problem was that you were so stuffed, food became a turn-off.
I found a parallel truth with the transfer of information; more is not necessarily better. The art of teaching is to leave students just a tad hungry so that they want to come back for more. For any public presentations, it’s just as important what you leave out, as what you put in! Over the years, I have sat for hundreds, perhaps thousands of hours in a multitude of classes. I’ve also had the wonderful opportunity to be on the opposite side of the lectern and have taught seminars, and classes. In my most recent experience I have had the responsibility to lead a once weekly class that had over fifty participants. I realize that it is hard for those who lead classes to know when enough is enough!
I found a parallel truth with the transfer of information; more is not necessarily better. The art of teaching is to leave students just a tad hungry so that they want to come back for more. For any public presentations, it’s just as important what you leave out, as what you put in! Over the years, I have sat for hundreds, perhaps thousands of hours in a multitude of classes. I’ve also had the wonderful opportunity to be on the opposite side of the lectern and have taught seminars, and classes. In my most recent experience I have had the responsibility to lead a once weekly class that had over fifty participants. I realize that it is hard for those who lead classes to know when enough is enough!
Although there were no dogs, the class leader did bring
three of her own dogs to use for demonstration purposes. Two of the three dogs
were crated on a rotational basis in her van, but one of the three was always
out and about. Unfortunately, the free dog became a distraction while the
leader spoke. At one point the dog, an eighteen month old Chesapeake retriever, literally, crawled up fully
onto the lap of a gentleman who was the dad of one of the younger participants!
Talk about making a scene. At the very end of the talk, the leader finally
needed the dog to demonstrate how to work the clicker to reward the dog. The
class leader had failed to gain the perspective that sometimes our behavior
speaks so loudly that no one can hear what we are saying. Again, this said to
me that there is a distinction between trained and obedient.
I came back the next week when people brought their dogs and
it was a good class. There were eight teams of various sizes and descriptions.
I noticed that all of the human participants were female. I was the only male
there. Why was that?
Pam clipped an advertisement in the paper that said that the
City of Williamsport
was sponsoring a free, 22 week (weather permitting) Doggie Boot Camp. Did I mention free? I decided
to check it out. There was an excellent turnout of all sizes and shapes and
that doesn’t even address the dogs that were there! The woman who was the class
leader was a no-nonsense type individual and her approach was to use slip
collars, also commonly called “choke collars”. It became evident that she was
especially enamored with the prong collar. If you didn’t want to buy such a
collar, they would supply one to you during the class. I saw them put such a slip
collar on a toy breed puppy. The collar probably represented 10% of the pup’s
weight. I noticed that all of the dogs of the people who were running this
class all had prong collars. Obviously, they all bought into this concept. In one of
the books I read, the author mentioned that a prong collar was like putting
power steering on a dog. I am sure that some dogs do benefit from this training
tool. I am suspicious, however, when one technique applies to every situation. Again
I surveyed the people population and although not everyone was female, most
were. All of the instructors were female.
One very attractive young couple showed up with a very handsome one year old Rottweiler. He was wearing a strange looking getup which I later learned was a Gentle Leader and the dog was not too pleased with it because he periodically would flop onto the ground and try to rub the device from his muzzle. The lead trainer was particularly negative about this device, because she said that in her experience, she had seen dogs slip out of these devices, and a Rottweiler running loose in a public park among 40 other dogs could create pandemonium. I found myself agreeing with her! When the training began, the young husband stepped back and his wife worked the dog. Why was that?
One very attractive young couple showed up with a very handsome one year old Rottweiler. He was wearing a strange looking getup which I later learned was a Gentle Leader and the dog was not too pleased with it because he periodically would flop onto the ground and try to rub the device from his muzzle. The lead trainer was particularly negative about this device, because she said that in her experience, she had seen dogs slip out of these devices, and a Rottweiler running loose in a public park among 40 other dogs could create pandemonium. I found myself agreeing with her! When the training began, the young husband stepped back and his wife worked the dog. Why was that?
I had an interesting experience just one week later. I ran
into our local K-Mart and on the way out I noticed several local high school cheerleaders
raising money for their sports teams. There was an older women with two very
well behaved dogs on a Down exercise, right there with the cheerleaders. I
couldn’t resist (perhaps I should have). I asked what was the significance of
the dogs. The women said that going to a store with lots of people, coming and
going, was a great opportunity to socialize her dogs. Those two dogs were obviously well
socialized and well behaved. So I asked her if she was affiliated with any dog
group. She said that she was a volunteer instructor at the business that was
running the Williamsport
Doggie Boot Camp. I looked down and both her dogs had prong collars. 100%!
At this point I had been exposed to various approaches and I
decided that when we did get our pup, I would start with non-aversive, clicker
training and reserve collar corrections for later, if need be.
Read next post.
Start at the very first post.
Read next post.
Start at the very first post.
No comments:
Post a Comment